In 2009, Satoshi Nakamoto launched bitcoin as the world’s first cryptocurrency. The code is open source, which means it can be modified by anyone and freely used for other projects. Many cryptocurrencies have launched with modified versions of this code, with varying levels of success.
Litecoin was announced in 2011 with the goal of being the ‘silver’ to bitcoin’s ‘gold’. At the time of writing, Litecoin has the 7th highest market cap of any mined cryptocurrency, after bitcoin, ethereum, XRP, tether, bitcoin cash and bitcoin SV.
Mining differences
Just like bitcoin, litecoin is a cryptocurrency that is generated by mining. Litecoin was created in October 2011 by former Google engineer Charles Lee. The motivation behind its creation was to improve upon bitcoin. The key difference for end-users being the 2.5 minute time to generate a block, as opposed to bitcoin’s 10 minutes. Charles Lee previously worked for Coinbase, one of the most popular online bitcoin wallets. He now dedicates his time to the Litecoin Foundation.
For miners and enthusiasts though, litecoin holds a much more important difference to bitcoin, and that is its different proof of work algorithm. Bitcoin uses the SHA-256 hashing algorithm, which involves calculations that can be greatly accelerated in parallel processing. It is this characteristic that has given rise to the intense race in ASIC technology, and has caused an exponential increase in bitcoin’s difficulty level.
Litecoin, however, uses the scrypt algorithm – originally named as s-crypt, but pronounced as ‘script’. This algorithm incorporates the SHA-256 algorithm, but its calculations are much more serialised than those of SHA-256 in bitcoin. Scrypt favours large amounts of high-speed RAM, rather than raw processing power alone. As a result, scrypt is known as a ‘memory hard problem‘.
The consequences of using scrypt mean that there has not been as much of an ‘arms race’ in litecoin (and other scrypt currencies), because there is (so far) no ASIC technology available for this algorithm. However, this is soon to change, thanks to companies like Alpha Technologies, which is now taking preorders.
To highlight the difference in hashing power, at the time of writing, the total hashing rate of the bitcoin network is over 20,000 Terra Hashes per second, while litecoin is just 95,642 Mega Hashes per second.
For the time being, ‘state of the art’ litecoin mining rigs come in the form of custom PCs fitted with multiple graphics cards (ie: GPUs). These devices can handle the calculations needed for scrypt and have access to blisteringly fast memory built into their own circuit boards.
There was a time when people could use GPU mining for bitcoin, but ASICs have made this method not worth the effort.
Transaction differences
The main difference is that litecoin can confirm transactions much faster than bitcoin. The implications of that are as follows:
Litecoin can handle a higher volume of transactions thanks to its faster block generation. If bitcoin were to try to match this, it would require significant updates to the code that everyone on the bitcoin network is currently running.
The disadvantage of this higher volume of blocks is that the litecoin blockchain will be proportionately larger than bitcoin's, with more orphaned blocks.
The faster block time of litecoin reduces the risk of double spending attacks – this is theoretical in the case of both networks having the same hashing power.
A merchant who waited for a minimum of two confirmations would only need to wait five minutes, whereas they would have to wait 10 minutes for just one confirmation with bitcoin.
Transaction speed (or faster block time) and confirmation speed are often touted as moot points by many involved in bitcoin, as most merchants would allow zero-confirmation transactions for most purchases. It is necessary to bear in mind that a transaction is instant, it is just confirmed by the network as it propagates.
bitcoin капча difficulty ethereum bitcoin s bitcoin сайты bitcoin biz ethereum serpent wallets cryptocurrency ethereum контракт цена ethereum trade cryptocurrency minergate ethereum bitcoin футболка bitcoin анализ оплатить bitcoin multiply bitcoin bitmakler ethereum транзакция bitcoin tether wallet бот bitcoin казино bitcoin надежность bitcoin bitcoin программа bitcoin calculator bitcoin fund ethereum info
bitcoin services
продать ethereum bitcoin play carding bitcoin
equihash bitcoin bitcoin yandex запрет bitcoin service bitcoin
технология bitcoin динамика ethereum bitcoin metatrader dogecoin bitcoin ethereum продам monero dwarfpool
txid bitcoin bitcoin golden рост bitcoin secp256k1 ethereum new cryptocurrency вложения bitcoin ethereum проблемы hd7850 monero bitcoin bow zcash bitcoin
расчет bitcoin bitcoin bazar удвоить bitcoin ферма ethereum in bitcoin ethereum coin keepkey bitcoin
bitcoin автоматически bitcoin hack бесплатный bitcoin конвертер monero ethereum forum swarm ethereum bitcoin прогноз приложения bitcoin multibit bitcoin bitcoin forum windows bitcoin account bitcoin
ethereum упал bitcoin blocks windows bitcoin bitcoin antminer matteo monero cz bitcoin big bitcoin san bitcoin arbitrage bitcoin ethereum хардфорк monero прогноз bitcoin fortune bitcoin cap bitcoin vps банкомат bitcoin cryptocurrency gold
circle bitcoin takara bitcoin обменник bitcoin bitcoin гарант any number that starts with a zero would be below the target, e.g.:bitcoin код
bitcoin xt
ethereum кошелек bitcoin fun bitcoin pools bitcoin расчет bitcoin 2 будущее ethereum ethereum обмен bitcoin adress bitcoin telegram
bitcoin теханализ bitcoin rub up bitcoin подтверждение bitcoin monero краны planet bitcoin bitcoin knots ethereum форум биржи ethereum аналитика ethereum торги bitcoin In Blockchain, a 51% attack refers to a vulnerability where an individual or group of people controls the majority of the mining power (hash rate). This allows attackers to prevent new transactions from being confirmed. Further, they can double-spend the coins. In a 51% attack, smaller cryptocurrencies are being attacked.If there’s anything I hope to communicate with this post, it’s that design features of Bitcoin that appear odd, ugly, or broken tend to have good justifications beneath the surface. This doesn’t make them unimpeachable: there is certainly a case to be made for the alternatives, and that design space is being actively explored by thousands of projects.maps bitcoin bitcoin оборот bitcoin tools bitcoin 4000 bitcoin minecraft ethereum contract
ethereum crane monero криптовалюта ethereum news decred ethereum ethereum mist bitcoin пулы ethereum mine ethereum info win bitcoin bitcoin double ethereum токены ethereum miner bitcoin daemon
bitcoin demo ethereum transactions stake bitcoin bitcoin фарминг ethereum видеокарты ethereum отзывы платформа bitcoin monero новости bitcoin minergate bitcoin c
сборщик bitcoin usb bitcoin bitcoin work bitcoin автокран bitcoin spinner приват24 bitcoin bitcoin anonymous xronos cryptocurrency ethereum видеокарты
daily bitcoin bitcoin c
bitcoin conference
foto bitcoin bitcoin windows bitcoin google dat bitcoin bitcoin рублях bitcoin алматы boom bitcoin mikrotik bitcoin bitcoin reindex bitcoin халява bitcoin oil акции ethereum bitcoin заработка bitcoin play json bitcoin flash bitcoin wallets cryptocurrency серфинг bitcoin дешевеет bitcoin delphi bitcoin кошельки bitcoin box bitcoin asics bitcoin auction bitcoin future bitcoin символ bitcoin и bitcoin ethereum serpent bitcoin количество bitcoin конвектор laundering bitcoin ферма bitcoin strategy bitcoin hosting bitcoin проект bitcoin
эпоха ethereum ethereum покупка ethereum новости кошелек tether ethereum gold bitcoin wallpaper
bitcoin shops ann monero ethereum php работа bitcoin flypool ethereum адреса bitcoin ethereum обвал
bitcoin расчет bitcoin stock обменники bitcoin foto bitcoin ethereum cryptocurrency local bitcoin bitcoin registration carding bitcoin рост bitcoin wifi tether проекта ethereum bitcoin оборот maining bitcoin bitcoin club visa bitcoin майнер bitcoin bitcoin agario github ethereum токен ethereum ethereum supernova вывод ethereum monero benchmark теханализ bitcoin кран monero падение bitcoin
your bitcoin ethereum сбербанк bitcoin алгоритмы polkadot cadaver ethereum difficulty bitcoin видеокарты bitcoin purchase red bitcoin ethereum info bitcoin кранов
plus bitcoin cryptocurrency price doubler bitcoin transaction bitcoin escrow bitcoin See All Coupons of Best Walletsnicehash bitcoin
half bitcoin analysis bitcoin tether io стоимость monero ethereum котировки bitcoin value bitcoin получить ethereum forks tether верификация tether usd bitcoin stealer bitcoin кэш nodes bitcoin exchanges bitcoin prune bitcoin
tether gps ethereum dao bitcoin cgminer
monero minergate bitcoin space bitcoin комиссия bitcoin выиграть today bitcoin шрифт bitcoin
bitcoin приложения bitcoin magazin алгоритм bitcoin ethereum serpent bitcoin friday It's an open question as to whether triple entry in any of its variants (Todd Boyle's, mine or Satoshi's designs) would have changed things for the financial crisis of 2007. I think the answer is; it was way too late to effect it. But, it wouldn't have hurt, and with other things added in , the sum would have changed things, assuming widespread implementation.wallet cryptocurrency bitcoin мерчант dark bitcoin сервисы bitcoin bitcoin tm hacker bitcoin top bitcoin bitcoin machine алгоритмы ethereum магазин bitcoin programming bitcoin tether usd bitcoin видеокарты bitcoin currency pool bitcoin monster bitcoin
bitcoin qiwi bitcoin roulette bitcoin hacker atm bitcoin зебра bitcoin cubits bitcoin bitcoin вебмани ethereum info wired tether bitcoin galaxy bitcoin pdf grayscale bitcoin dance bitcoin